logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.11.16 2015고단1115
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A and B Each fine of KRW 3,00,000,000, Defendant C’s imprisonment of April, Defendant D, E, F, and G respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

I (Suspension of indictment on the same day) is the actual operator of the so-called "O, defendant D, and E" means the actual operator of the so-called "O"-called "O" game room located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, J. K receives three million won from I, and K is the so-called "O" president who entered into a lease contract for the present game room in its own name, and L plays the role of managing the main game room and other employees, and M, N, defendant A, B, and C are the so-called "O" staff who play the role of attracting customers in each game room, and the staff who play the role of leading the customers to the present game room using the name of "O, G, Gak and one food."

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from those of the rating, for distribution or use, and exchange the results of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

However, K and L in collusion with I, from August 17:0 to 22:10 of the same month from August 25, 2014, from around 17:00 to around 22:10 of the same month, the game site in this case, unlike the contents of the rating for the "marb" game machine, which is the entire game, installed and implemented a program of "marine camping", thereby automatically altering the 49 game machine to automatically proceed irrespective of the game user's ability to operate, provide customers with 10% of the fee, and make customers exchange the score acquired through the said game for cash by deducting 10% of the fee.

In committing the above crimes, the Defendants assisted and abetted each employee by taking charge of attracting customers, exchanging them, holding them in charge of carcing, transporting customers, etc. as an employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning each of the police suspects against the Defendants, L, K, andO;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow