beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 7, 2013, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years with prison labor for fraud at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 24, 2014. Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for ten months at the Seoul Central District Court on May 27, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2014.
Defendant A, “2015 Highest 3017”, Defendant A, a master executor of the G apartment development project in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Taenam-gun, prepared an urgent amount of funds to sell the above apartment at a discount with Defendant C and Defendant B, and used them to divide them into part.
Accordingly, Defendant B deposited KRW 21,60,000, which is 10% of the total sale price, into the Korea Land Trust and deposited KRW 64,80,000, which is 30% of the total sale price, with KRW 30% of the total sale price deposited into the Korea Land Trust, and deposited KRW 64,80,000,000, which is 30% of the total sale price, to the victim K (hereinafter “J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office”) in Seosan-si, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, with KRW 104,1502, which is paid in full, KRW 1500,00. The remainder of the sale price under G104,502, which is 10% of the total sale price, is 10% of the total sale price, and the remainder of the sale price under the name of 60% is 40% of the remainder of the intermediate payment to be paid in full.
However, the facts are as follows: (a) He did not have received the above apartment from the victim or paid the sales price in full; (b) around June 201, he concluded a land trust agreement with the Korea Land Trust and entered into the land trust agreement with the Korea Land Trust and did not have the authority to sell the above apartment, or to discount or receive the sales price of the above apartment; and (c) even if the Defendants received 64,800,000 won from the victim, they thought to be used for other purposes.