1. The plaintiff's appeal and this court's addition to E, F, G, and H, the defendant himself/herself and the network C's lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. The Network J (Death, Aug. 20, 1951) having been the owner of the instant real estate had a deceased M (Death, Feb. 28, 1995) between the deceased K (the deceased on Feb. 28, 1995) and the deceased M (the deceased on Feb. 21, 199). The deceased C is the deceased M's spouse, Defendant G, H and D, and the network M (Death, Feb. 21, 1999). Defendant E and F are the deceased M's children.

B. As to the instant real estate, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 10, 1948 under the name of the Council on January 17, 1948, under the name of the deceased on January 10, 1948, under the name of the deceased on September 19, 2014, under the name of the deceased C (3/11 shares), D, Defendant G, H (2/11 shares, respectively), E, and F (1/11 shares, respectively) on August 20, 1951.

C. On October 17, 2014, Defendant B purchased net C and/or 9/11 equity shares held by the Defendants in the instant real estate from the deceased C and Defendant E, F, G, and H from October 17, 2014, KRW 34,918,400. On the same day, Defendant B completed the entire transfer registration of the instant equity shares in the name of Defendant B.

The net N was killed on March 199, while he cultivated the instant real estate by being handed over from the Dong K, a relative relative, around 1955, and the Plaintiff, as his heir, continued to possess the instant real estate after being succeeded to the possession.

E. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the deceased on December 26, 2016, while this Court was pending, and on the other hand, the deceased C died, and there was Defendant E and F, who is the inheritor of the deceased C, the heir of D and G, H and network S, and D renounced inheritance.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 5, 6, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Around 1955, the Plaintiff’s assertion K agreed to accord and sell the instant real estate in return for assisting the deceased N to work in the future. The network N occupies the instant real estate in a peaceful and public manner for at least 20 years from around that time, and at least on December 31, 1975, the acquisition by prescription was completed, and the Plaintiff’s real estate from the network N.