logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.26 2017고단2153
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant d convenience stores located in C when light lights around 02:00, the Defendant dumped the disturbance under the influence of alcohol.

The Defendant reported that “under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant is a frighter, frighter, or frighter,” and that the Defendant fright and frightered the Defendant’s shoulder, frighter, who was a police officer belonging to the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station, sent to the above convenience store, and fright the Defendant’s shoulder, fright, fright, or frighter, fright of a fright, not a frighter, so that it is difficult for the Defendant to escape.

In doing the bath theory, “A person may be punished as a crime of insult if he/she continues to perform his/her duties” under the warning to the effect that the above F’s arms would be sealed and sealed, and that “A person can be punished as a crime of insult if he/she continues to perform his/her duties,” and “A person who takes part in his/her bath to the effect that “A person would have a person broken and defecil a person,” and the F who restrains him/her from carrying out his/her bath to the effect that “A person interferes with the execution of his/her duties, she shall be punished as a crime of insult.”

C. Having expressed the desire to read “F” and requested F to take out of the above convenience store and to provide other patrol vehicles with support.

D. D. F. F. F. D. Does, F. F. F. F. Doing that “this f.e., this f.e., f., f.e., f., f.e., f., f., f.e., f., f., f., and f.e., f., f., f., f., f., and f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.,

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on protective measures against police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the closure of damaged photographs and video images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

arrow