logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.26 2016가합53666
집행문부여에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. The Defendants’ provisional disposition against the Plaintiffs, such as the prohibition of interference with the instant court’s 2016Kahap13 worships, churches, and related affairs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 11, 2016, the Defendants and the R&D Association filed an application for provisional disposition against the Plaintiffs (referring to the Plaintiffs) to the effect that “the debtors (referring to the Plaintiffs) shall not interfere with the creditors’ towing, alteration, and related work by preventing the distribution of electricity, water, urban gas as to the buildings listed in the separate sheet against the obligees’ will, or by obstructing the creditors and creditors’ and R&D associations (hereinafter “creditor church”) from entering the separate building, and by preventing the creditors from entering the separate building; the execution officer of the Gwangju District Court delegated by the creditors shall publicly announce the purport of the order in an appropriate manner and take other appropriate measures for its enforcement; and if the debtors violate the order, the court filed an application for provisional disposition with the effect that “the debtors shall pay one million won per offense with each obligee” on January 13, 2016, the court made an indirect decision of provisional disposition (hereinafter “instant decision of provisional disposition”).

1. The court shall dismiss applications filed against the debtors of creditors and churches.

2. The obligor shall not interfere with the obligee’s worship, worship, and related affairs by blocking the supply of electricity, water, and urban gas to the buildings listed in the separate sheet against the will of the remaining obligees except for the obligee’s church (hereinafter “creditor’s believers”) or by obstructing the obligee’s believers from entering the buildings listed in the separate sheet.

3. An execution officer shall publicly notify the purport of the order to be stated in paragraph (2) in an appropriate manner.

4. If the debtor violates the order described in Paragraph 2, the debtor who committed the act of violation shall pay to the new creditor, 3.5 million won per day of the act of violation (2.5 million won per each creditor) to the new creditor.

5. The debtors of new creditors.

arrow