The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

We examine the grounds of appeal.

1. For the purpose of assessing that there exists any defect in the subject matter of sale, it should be explicitly or explicitly acknowledged that the seller has offered the goods to the buyer, even if the goods are not in existence of the ordinary quality or performance, or the buyer has demanded the seller to supply the goods having the quality or performance required for the environment or situation while explaining the overall environment or situation in which the goods are to be used, and that the seller has explicitly or explicitly guaranteed and supplied the fact that the goods have such quality or performance;

According to the reasoning of the lower judgment on April 12, 2002, the lower court acknowledged the facts as stated in its reasoning. The lower court determined that there was no sufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff guaranteed the Defendant that the tonnage of the instant case was a product with a capacity of one ton, and there was no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff explicitly or implicitly guaranteed it to the Defendant, and that the tonnage of the instant case was insufficient to recognize that there was insufficient seal strength to use it for the purpose of 500 km of the Plaintiff’s assertion.

In light of the above legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is just, and it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on defects in the subject matter of sale, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.