beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
D The general manager responsible for recruiting persons eligible for disguised marriage of Vietnam women who want to enter for domestic employment and connecting them with Vietnam women, and leading a disguised marriage overall such as distribution of various documents, money, etc. necessary for disguised marriage, and E and F, under the condition that one million won per capita shall be paid from D above, engaged in the following crimes in collusion with Korean men who want to enter the Republic of Vietnam without genuine will, in collusion, engage in disguised marriage with those who want to enter the Republic of Korea for domestic employment on condition that 4 million won shall be paid for the entry for domestic employment without genuine will.
1. On January 12, 2010, Defendant A conspired with the above D, G, and H, and on the family register book of the public service center in Dolwon-gun, Hahwon-gun, Hahwon-gun, Hahwon-gun, Hahwon-gun, the fact was that Defendant A and the above H had a public official in charge submit a marriage report as if they had not been married with each other, and had the public official in charge enter the marriage in the Defendant A’s family register information system, such as a letter of notarized prepared in advance, and had the public official in charge enter the marriage in the Defendant A’s family register information system, and had the public official in charge record enter and enter the false facts in the public official’s family register information system, which is an electronic record, and exercised the above public electronic records containing the false marriage.
2. Defendant B’s above Defendant D,
F. On February 18, 201, in collusion with I, at the North-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Office located in the Daegu Northern-dong, Daegu Northern-dong on February 18, 201, the facts were: (a) Defendant B and I had no intention to marry but to marry; (b) had the public official in charge enter into the family register information system of Defendant B by preparing a marriage report as if they had been married under normal circumstances; and (c) having had the public official in charge enter into the family register information system.