A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant has maintained internal relations between the victim C (V, 55 years old) and the victim for about five years, and the Defendant has been living with another male unless the victim has received his own telephone.

It has been doubtful and shown that the victim continued to telephone until the victim receives the telephone.

1. On January 28, 2017, from around 21:00 to around 02:00 of the following day, the Defendant: (a) was doubtful that the victimized person at the Defendant’s house located in the Gun of the Republic of Korea from around 21:00 to around 02:00 of the following day, left the head of the victimized person, and she was suspected that the injured person met another male; (b) she she was fleeped in the two mains of the small branch of the small branch of the State; (c) she was flicking the victim’s face and her body; (d) she was flicking the victim’s body in the victim’s body by going beyond the floor.

The victim's head has been stamped once, and the victim's head has been removed once, and the victim's buckbucks (57 cm in length, 4 cm in thickness), which is a dangerous object, have been unloaded once, and the victim's body has been recovered in total toy.

In addition, around 05:00 on January 29, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim from January 28, 2017 to January 29, 2017, from around 05:00 on the police and prosecutor’s office to the next day from January 29, 2017, and had sexual intercourse with the victim around 04:00.

In the indictment, the time when the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim is stated 04:00.

However, when the Defendant’s assault was terminated, the time was 02:00 when the Defendant’s assault was 02:00.

On the contrary to the fact that the time when the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim is 04:00, the defendant did not present the above grounds, and the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim from the police investigation to this court.

Considering that the statement is made, it would hinder the exercise of the defendant's right to defense.