logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.22 2019가합11736
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 26,869,851; (b) KRW 20,951,370 to Plaintiff A; and (c) KRW 20,951,370 to each said money. From November 6, 2014 to 20.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned are corporations operating the Chungcheong University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in 776, the Cheongju-si 1 cycle, Seoju-si, and the Plaintiffs complaining of the uniforms out of the labsium on October 27, 2014, and were hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on November 6, 2014, and were hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. 1) The Deceased was diagnosed as ESD; ESD; Edrephal disasesesese disease (ESD; Edrephal disase), around May 2009, the Deceased continued to undergo a medical examination of the outpatient (CAPD; Contuous Ambulththththroththrothy dys) from February 2013. From February 2013, the Deceased was under the symptoms of the Defendant hospital and the outpatient and the outpatient pain treatment. 2) The Deceased was hospitalized on October 26, 2014 through the Defendant hospital’s emergency room, and around December 23, 2014, the Deceased was hospitalized in the hospital and the outpatient treatment around 2014.

C. After being hospitalized, the Deceased’s symptoms and measures taken by Defendant Hospital 1) had symptoms to the effect that, on November 5, 2014, the day immediately before the instant accident occurred, the Deceased complained of the symptoms, such as satisfeing, satisfeing, falling down, and falling down, and satisfeing to the Deceased, and that there was an unsatisfeing, sating, satisf and behavior, and an island network symptoms. 2) On October 29, 2014, the Defendant hospital’s symptoms and proceedings requested a compromise from the doctor in charge of the Deceased were proved to the effect that the Defendant hospital’s wishes to cooperate with the Deceased, “Catfus,” and this is highly likely to result from chronological brainopphethy.”

3 The mental health doctor of the defendant hospital who was requested for a cooperation from the doctor in charge of the deceased did not interfere with the crypology on November 3, 2014, and there is no other medical condition.

arrow