The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 21, 2012, the Defendant issued the instant charges to the said victim that “I am a horse, I am a horse, I am a stop to stop the Defendant’s vehicle behind the Defendant’s vehicle, the vehicle parked on the front of the apartment house, and the vehicle parked by the victim C (Taking women, 50 years old) on the front of the instant apartment site located in Gwangju-dong School, Gwangju-gu.”

Accordingly, the above victim stated that "I amb the president, I am a simple apology, and would like to start the vehicle of the victim," and that "I am a bit of bit of bitbit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

As above, the above Defendant threatened the above victim, thereby obstructing the exercise of rights by the said victim.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by the court below, it is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case where the victim was in a vehicle with his own judgment in the course of vision and dispute arising from parking problems with the defendant. The evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case where the victim’s exercise of rights was obstructed by threatening the victim’s body by getting the victim out of the vehicle against his/her own will, by putting the victim’s shoulder down, etc., and thereby causing the victim’s exercise of rights. There is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

① The evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case is not 's.'