Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at Jinju City, was in custody of the Defendant’s house in E 203, and owned 80,000 won of the daily market price and 8.1 billion won of the goods.

On June 25, 2013, the execution officer F, who belongs to the Jinwon District Court Jinju, entrusted the execution of G by the creditor G, seized the above goods at the defendant's home on June 25, 2013, based on the original copy of the decision of seizure of corporeal movables in the above court No. 2013No. 7733, the above goods were seized and affixed

However, on June 2013, the Defendant removed without permission a seizure mark attached to the above goods from the Defendant’s house at the Defendant’s house, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and G;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A petition for compulsory execution, a report on attachment of corporeal movables, and a report on inspection of seized objects;

1. Request for the suspension of compulsory execution, decision on recommending compromise, execution clause, delivery/ fixed certificate source, and withdrawal/collection of deposit money;

1. Investigation report (attached to the statement, etc.), duplicate of the statement statement, and duplicate of the suspect interrogation protocol (H);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;