The sentence against the accused shall be set forth as a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a food manufacturing company with the trade name of “B” and closes down, and currently operates a food manufacturing company of “C” of “C”.

On June 1, 2018, the Defendant rendered a judgment to pay KRW 15,440,360 in relation to the claim for the purchase price of goods filed by creditors D Co., Ltd. in Suwon-nam District Court 2017Gau 18996.

On July 3, 2018, the enforcement officer E, who belongs to the Ji Government District Court Goyang Branch, entrusted the execution of D Co., Ltd., and attached automatic packaging machines of an amount equivalent to 35 million won at the factory of the defendant located in G in Pakistan on July 3, 2018, with the original copy of the decision of seizure of F Ccorporeal movables in the above court, and affixed a red marking of seizure on the goods.

However, around September 2018, the Defendant concealed the seized goods by moving the seized automatic packaging machines from the Haak-gun H Co., Ltd. at the Defendant’s right plant at the Defendant’s right plant at the end of the end of September 2018, and harming its utility by removing the seized signs attached to the said machines due to water cleaning.

(A) On April 4, 2019 to April 5, 2019, the Defendant violated the Labor Standards Act on February 2, 2019: (a) as the representative director of the Company C located in Chungcheongnam-gun Hong-gun H, the Defendant failed to pay the total of KRW 4,057,200 to the seven workers’ wages, as indicated in the attached crime list, including KRW 133,60,00, as well as KRW 14 days from the date of retirement.

(At least 2020 fixed59) Summary of evidence / [2019 fixed 143] The police suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol against the accused, such as attachment report of corporeal movables and photographs of operation as of the machinery of the protocol of inspection of seized objects [20, 59] The police protocol against the accused, I, J, five others, and K respectively;

1. Relevant Article 140(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and Article 109(1) of the Labor Standards Act