logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.11.25 2016가단2000
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff, who operates a gas construction business under the trade name of "C", is not able to pay personnel expenses, such as gas pipes at the site he received, and the plaintiff, who is engaged in the same kind of gas construction business as D, requested that the plaintiff be responsible for paying the expenses, and the plaintiff shall complete the whole construction work entrusted by the defendant, and the plaintiff shall deposit 34,245,000 won in total in the construction work price of the 69,630,000 won in the second half of the year of 2015 and the remaining 35,385,000 won in the remainder of the construction work price of the 69,385,000 won in the second half of the year of 2015, and thus the defendant is liable

2. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that claims for construction cost of KRW 69,630,000 have occurred due to the completion of construction work between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, since there is no other evidence to acknowledge

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow