logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고합485
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for four years, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from March 3, 2008 to July 23, 2015, while serving as the full-time president of the Saemaul Bank in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon as the president of the Saemaul Bank. Defendant B, while serving as the full-time president of the said Bank from April 16, 1990 to December 9, 2015, was in charge of the overall operation and receipt of the Treasury by assisting the full-time president. Defendant C was in charge of credit affairs while serving as the head of the said Treasury and the Chairperson of the Loan Deliberation Committee from April 1, 1991 to August 10, 2015, and the actual borrower O was in charge of the factory development project in Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun as the operator of the company established for the purpose of real estate development business.

1. The executives and employees of the Saemaul Bank in violation of the Saemaul Bank Act shall not, in conducting credit affairs of the Saemaul Bank, lend loans in excess of the larger amount between 20/100 of the total sum of the investments and the reserve funds of the relevant Saemaul Bank or 1/100 of the total assets in accordance with the provisions of the Saemaul Bank Act, the Credit Business Regulations, the Credit Business Regulations, and the Credit Business Manual, etc.;

A. On October 2012, Defendants were requested to loan KRW 1,376,00,000 from the Plaintiff to the end of October 18, 2012 at the office of the same credit cooperative office in the name of the actual borrower, even though they had already purchased the land for the Sung-gun Q Group from the actual borrower O to request for the loan to sell the factory, and even if they had paid the loan equivalent to KRW 1,376,00,000 from September 19, 2012 to October 18, 2012, the Defendants were requested to request the borrower to loan KRW 1,30,000 from the Plaintiff.

In the event that a loan amount of KRW 1,574,156,149 is extended to KRW 1,300,000,000,000,000,000 won as of March 3/4, 2012, the Defendants: (a) as the same person’s loan limit to the actual borrowerO was exceeded; and (b) it was impossible for the actual borrower to make an additional loan under the name of P; and (c) the Defendants made the Fund entry into the name of the holder of the loan to implement the loan to the O.

arrow