logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.19 2015가합101543
정정보도등 청구의 소
Text

1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall screen the initial page of the I (J) website within three (3) days from the date the judgment of this case became final and conclusive;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a press organization that aims at broadcasting business and cultural service business. 2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a press organization that publishes “(J) online newspaper” I, and Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H are the reporters belonging to Defendant B:

Done the article in question as described in the subsection.

B. Defendant B’s news report No. 1) The Plaintiff’s employees engaged in strike from January 30, 2012 to July 17, 2012 for the purpose of guaranteeing “the withdrawal of the president of the UU president” and “the fairness of broadcasting.” Meanwhile, the Sewol ferry was sunken on April 16, 2014, and many students, etc. of the member high school were killed (the Sewol ferry case), and the Plaintiff reported the said case around that time.

3) In order to expand business sales in a way to overcome business difficulties due to the reduction of advertising revenues, the Plaintiff was under large-scale reorganization on October 27, 2014, including the establishment of a new business development center, new media format development center, drama marketing division, arts marketing division, and special business division. Accordingly, Defendant B issued personnel orders to many employees on October 31, 2014 (such as reorganization). C. Defendant B’s report 1) on August 20, 2014 through online newspapers seven times from August 27, 2014 to September 27, 2014, but the Plaintiff appears to be critical to the effect that the report on the Plaintiff’s Sewol ferry case was written on August 20, 2014; August 23, 2014; August 23, 2014; August 14, 2014; August 14, 2014; and the Plaintiff appears to be the reporter on August 21, 2014;

The Plaintiff asserted as of September 21, 2014 as of September 22, 2014, but according to the Gap evidence No. 22, the above article appears to have been reported on September 21, 2014;

On September 27, 2014, each article was reported.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant articles”) 2, and Defendant B, with respect to the reorganization, etc. of the Plaintiff, via Internet newspaper I on October 27, 2014.

arrow