logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고단2049
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 모욕 피고인은 2019. 1. 22. 16:45경 용인시 수지구 B에 있는 C 편의점 앞길에서 ‘술 취한 아저씨가 바퀴 밑에 발을 집어넣고 못 가게 한다. 차도 발로 찼다. 욕설을 한다.'는 내용의 112신고를 받고 출동한 피해자인 용인서부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E과 피해자인 같은 지구대 소속 경장 F으로부터 신분증 제시를 요구받자, 신고자인 G과 그 일행인 H 등이 있는 가운데 피해자들에게 “이 씨발놈이, 씨발새끼, 구속해, 뭐 새끼야!”라는 등 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, received 112 reports on the same contents as Paragraph (1) and received a request for presentation of identification cards from E belonging to the same district unit F, such as the Gancho Police Station D, which belongs to the Gancho Police Station D, and received a request for presentation of identification cards, and the F’s clothes in drinking, three times, and three times, carried in fat and fat, carried out the fat and fat

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of H, G and I;

1. Articles 311 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the order of provisional payment was committed on the ground that, in the case of the crime of this case on the ground that a drunk defendant scam between two vehicles traveling across the two vehicles, the drunk defendant could not put the wheels under one of the two vehicles, and the police officer was dispatched to the police officer upon receiving 112 report, and the police officer took a bath or assault to the police officer, and the police officer was forced to take a duty in a lawful manner.

arrow