Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant B, D, and E by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The proprietor operating the I Gameland in Nam-gu Busan, the proprietor managing the overall business of the above Gameland, the head of the business division managing the affairs of the above Gameland, the head of the business office managing the defendant B and the head of the business office managing the gameland, the employee who exchanged the books acquired by the customers outside the above Gameland, the employee who exchanged the books acquired by the customers outside the above Gameland, the defendant D provides guidance on exchange to the customers, and the J operates the above Gameland.

Defendant

A is an employee who assists in the overall business while transferring the above gameland to A, K, and L are engaged in cleaning and hearting in the above gameland.

According to the above division of roles, the Defendants conspired with J, K, and L, from February 18, 2013 to May 14, 2013, in collusion with the above division of roles, set up 20 units of space shooting game in the above I Gameland, 10 units of right game in North Korea, and 10 units of Nowon-do game in the above I Gameland, and the customers acquired from the game by exchanging the books to 4,500 won per opening.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the choice of each fine for the Defendants A, B, D, and E)

1. Defendants B, D, and E at the workhouse of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant C: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant C of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants: Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

1. Defendant B, D, and E: The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment due to serious social harm, and Defendant C has the history of being sentenced to a fine due to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act.