Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Coinado sports car.

On November 28, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 14:30 on November 28, 2018, and proceeded with the road near C in order to about 50 km from the gold-ri direction to D.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly manipulating the front section and the left and right of the driver of a motor vehicle and properly manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the steering direction and operation system, and caused the utility pole, a corporation, E-owned utility poles on the right side of the road, which were in front of the passenger car of the defendant, to use it on the road. The cable connected to the utility pole increased on the road and made it impossible for other vehicles to pass on the road.

Although the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed 97,600 won of repair expenses, he immediately stopped the utility pole, and did not take necessary measures such as checking the situation of damage and reporting it to the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial description of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a report on actual condition;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Investigation report (suspects' suspicion of non-measures after an accident);

1. On-site photographs;

1. The Defendant, including a quotation, argued to the effect that, after receiving a communication from the Defendant, the Defendant was called to the scene, notified the fact of the accident to E, requested the management of the accident, and then left the scene where the wife gets on board the vehicle in order to go to the hospital. Since the latter was called to E, the Defendant notified the fact of the accident by phoneing to E, and was unable to take necessary measures after the traffic accident. Thus, according to the foregoing evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the traffic accident in this case is the instant case.