logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.04.11 2017고단1219
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 31, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment by the High Military Court on September 16, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Armed Forces Prison on January 16, 2016. On April 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 28, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 18, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving DK7 automobiles without obtaining a driver’s license in approximately 3.9km from the Do of Vinininsins in the short-term driving of the Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, to the front of C in the same city.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle DK7 vehicle.

The defendant got to proceed from the side of the site to the sand-resistant distance on the front side of the site at the front of the Gangwon-si.

There are three-lane roads, and since a utility pole has been installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle by accurately reducing the speed in advance to a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle, and by checking whether there is an obstacle, etc. in the direction of the path by properly examining the situation of the front left right right right right right and right right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the vehicle as it is and caused the electric utility to the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle by negligence.

After all, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business, destroyed the repair cost to the extent that the utility pole was damaged, left away without immediately stopping the utility pole and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual condition and an accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about residents and criminal history;

1. The Road Traffic Act applicable to criminal facts;

arrow