logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.25 2016가단123096
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As from February 3, 2016, Defendant B and D, each of the 200,000 won, and its related thereto:

B. Defendant C, E, F, and G are each 200.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a cartoon in the process of filing a web claim I in the Joseon Dynasty.

B. The Plaintiff written an article concerning the deletion of the Plaintiff’s interview, which was posted on his SNS’s tables, from his SNS companies. The Plaintiff published the Plaintiff’s SNS bulletin at the NK news, thereby providing it to the Internet portal server servers.

C. The Defendants posted the article on the N.V., expressed the comments as follows.

A person who, without the context of logic on February 3, 2016, 1 B of the content of the comments comments on the Defendant’s name bulletin No. 1 B on February 3, 2016, boomed a cartoon brucing brucing content in politics. No further conscience exists.

It is not simply a refusal to do so, but instead a biter's in a wrong direction. In other words, it is not a refusal to instigate a biter who is not aware of it by a bitt web.

Along with those who oppose to the national textbook, shotizing the times of female as a sexual product, shot of false information that was well-known and well-known, and that was no longer listed.

2 C 2016. 2. 4. 퉤퉤 존나 더러운새끼 3 D 2016. 2. 3. 얘는 그냥 무뇌성향이지 극우는 뭐 아무나 하냐 4 E 2016. 2. 4. 카악 퉤 아으 드러워.. 5 F 2016. 2. 4. 극우에다 무식하기까지 참 내 6 G 2016. 2. 4. 아무리 조선일보라해도..

Does francing, Doz. Doz. 7 H H on February 3, 2016, Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. / [Grounds for Recognition] without dispute, the descriptions of evidence A Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. (1) Determination as to the cause of the claim (a) establishment of the liability for damages refers to the expression of an abstract judgment or satisfic sentiment which would prejudice people's social assessment without revealing the facts.

According to the above facts, the defendants write comments on Internet news that can be seen by many unspecified persons.

arrow