beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of dismissal against the Plaintiff A on February 21, 2012 confirms that it is null and void.
2. The plaintiff B's claim.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a juristic person established on December 1, 1993 and engaged in automobile parts manufacturing business using 610 full-time workers. The plaintiff A is a worker who was employed by the defendant on March 18, 1996, and the plaintiff B is a worker who was employed by the defendant on January 23, 1995.
B. On October 1, 201, Plaintiff A was elected as the president of the Daejeonbuk Branch C Branch of the World Trade Union (hereinafter “instant Branch”) on October 1, 201, and Plaintiff B was elected as the secretary of the said Branch on the same day.
C. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant Disciplinary Committee made a disciplinary dismissal against Plaintiff A, three months of suspension from office against Plaintiff B, and sent the grounds for the disciplinary resolution to the Plaintiffs on February 17, 2012. The grounds for the disciplinary resolution are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff A instructed Plaintiff A not to work at night on December 29, 201; (b) the act of obstructing the members who worked at night on December 30, 201 from attending work; (c) the act of ordering the Plaintiff to refuse to work at night on January 5, 2012 (1.8); (d) the act of ordering Plaintiff B to refuse to work at night on a collective basis on or after January 10, 2012; and (e) the act of ordering Plaintiff B to refuse to work at night on or after the act of causing interference with Plaintiff B’s work at night; and (b) the act of causing interference with Plaintiff B’s work at night on or after January 11, 2012.
1.10.1
1.14.
1.15.
1. It is assumed that the employer violated Article 75, Article 13, and Article 75, subparagraph 14 of the Rules of Employment due to the act of interference with the duties of members working on 17.
On February 21, 2012, the defendant took disciplinary action against the plaintiffs as of February 21, 2012, and notified them that they would be punished by three months of suspension from office (from February 21, 2012 to May 20, 2012). The grounds for disciplinary action attached to the notice are as follows.
【Plaintiff A】
1. On March 18, 1996, the above persons are serving as mste-WS technical staff members on March 18, 1991.