beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
Defendant
If A and B fail to pay the above fine, 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B as the representative director of Defendant C in Gwangju Mine-gu, the business owner of Defendant C is the general manager of safety and health management concerning the business of Defendant C, the business owner, and Defendant A is a director of the same company, who directs and supervises workers at the site of fire-fighting system repair work conducted in the “H Gwangju G” located in Gwangjubuk-gu, Gwangju.
At around 14:00 on November 17, 2013, four workers belonging to the above company were engaged in the installation of piping pipes at the center of the center of the 1st floor above the 1st floor of Gwangju Metropolitan City, and at the same time, there was a square 2.3 meters in depth due to mechanical parking facility equipment.
1. A business owner in violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act against Defendant B and Defendant B, as the end or opening part of the work launch board and passage, must be built in a strong structure with sufficient strength to take protective measures, such as safety railings, fences, vertical fall network, cover, etc., at the place where workers might fall down, and the commander at the construction site has a duty of care to ensure that the workers, such as the opening part, etc., take protective measures such as safety distress, fences, vertical fall-off net, or cover, etc., in the place where workers, such as the opening part, etc., might fall down at the construction site, and the workers have a duty of care to perform the work.
Defendant
B The representative director of C, who visited the construction site of this case and confirmed the risk of falling at the construction site of this case, was negligent in the course of business that did not instruct the Defendant A, who is the work commander at the construction site, to take protective measures against the falling risk, without preparing or proposing measures to prevent the fall risk, Defendant A, who did not take protective measures against the safety distress at the opening of the construction site of this case, and the victim who installed pipes at the construction site of this case around November 17, 2013.