logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2016.06.23 2015고단548
공유수면관리및매립에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person of the 2015 Highest 548" shall obtain permission to occupy and use public waters, such as ditches, from the competent authorities in order to occupy and use public waters.

It is obvious that the "F at the time of racing" as stated in the facts charged in the facts charged in the racing, the "F at the time of racing" is a clerical error.

on March 3, 1980, the land category is a ditch, and the owner is a State (state) and is registered in the forest register on March 3, 1980, and on November 13, 1987, the public waters whose ownership is preserved and registered in the real estate register.

From around January 13, 2015 to around January 13, 2015, the Defendant occupied and used public waters in a manner of installing a 2,569 square meter and a pump room on the aggregate on the surface of 2,569 square meters of the above F without obtaining permission from the competent authorities to occupy and use public waters.

The defendant of "2016 Highest 349" is the issuer of H, a local newspaper.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a cuss car in I. It is against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On May 15, 2015, the Defendant, using the above car around 09:50 on May 15, 2015, taken a step back from the site of the K's factory site development site located in the J of the race-si, with L and M, and used it to take the site pictures through L. Around 09:54 on the same day, the Defendant turned back the car to leave the site to leave the site.

At the time, the victim N(36) who is an on-site employee, had a duty of care to take a vehicle number of the defendant's vehicle, so the defendant who is engaged in driving of the vehicle had a duty of care to avoid the victim safely and prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant got knee knee kne part of the victim's right knee kne, which was behind the passenger car due to the negligence of the defendant, and got the victim to go beyond the vehicle again by taking the same method.

In the end, it is eventually.

arrow