logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.01.26 2016고정541
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who intends to engage in development activities, such as changing the form and quality of land in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, shall obtain permission from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, on February 2016, the Defendant engaged in development activities by way of organizing the floor by using the Dodododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododododo, in a 33,306 square meters, which was around

2. Any person who intends to draw water from public waters in violation of the Act on the Management and Reclamation of Public Waters shall obtain permission to occupy or use public waters from the management agency of public waters.

Nevertheless, from February 2016 to August 2016, the Defendant occupied or used public waters by drawing seawater from nearby beaches through the PVC material pipe (250m in diameter, 11m in length) to operate a new fish farming business without obtaining permission to occupy or use public waters from the public waters management authorities.

3. A person who intends to engage in fisheries cultivating marine animals or plants at land or plants artificially created on land or sea waters in violation of Acts and subordinate statutes shall obtain permission from the competent authority for each fishing vessel, fishing gear, or facility;

Nevertheless, from May 7, 2016 to August 2016, the Defendant engaged in inland sea-water cultivating fisheries by entering the land indicated in paragraph (1) in a manner of planting KRW 800,000 “new seedlings” without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

4. No one shall illegally occupy or use agricultural production infrastructure without justifiable grounds;

Nevertheless, the Defendant illegally occupied and used a tide embankment which is an agricultural production infrastructure in the vicinity of the above land without justifiable grounds at the time and place specified in paragraph 3.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Copy of the police statement made to C;

1. Illegal sprinks.

arrow