beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around May 4, 2018, the Defendant posted a false statement on the Defendant’s residence in Namwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the effect that the Defendant sold the Gu’s waste A to the “former Linter” (hereinafter “former Linter”) at the Defendant’s residence, and that the Defendant deposited KRW 269,000 to the victim B who had contacted with the Defendant.
However, the defendant did not have the above goods at the time, and the money received from the injured party was thought to be consumed for the cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to send the goods to the injured party.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 269,000 won from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (D) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, posted a false statement to the effect that “I sell Aphones” to “I sell Aphones” at the 20,000 won at the time and place, and that I would send the above article to the victim E who reported and contacted the above fact.
However, the defendant did not have the above goods at the time, and the money received from the injured party was thought to be consumed for the cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to send the goods to the injured party.
Nevertheless, the Defendant received 300,000 won from the damaged party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account listed in paragraph 1 on the same day.
3. On May 5, 2018, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would sell the former franchisium A to the mobile fishing flus “outer” at the location described in paragraph (1) at the location, and that the Defendant would send the said article to the victim F who reported and contacted the 269,000 won if it was deposited into the victim F.
However, the defendant did not have the above goods at the time, and the money received from the injured party was thought to be consumed for the cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to send the goods to the injured party.
Nevertheless, the defendant.