1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The part of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against the Defendant Republic of Korea demanding confirmation of ownership.

1. The reasons why this Court shall explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications or additions. As such, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From 4th to 2th, the first instance court's decision

E. On October 29, 1987, the registration of preservation of ownership (No. 22464, Oct. 29, 1987, which was received on October 29, 1987, by the owner of the Nancheon City Nancheon-si's land as the defendant Republic of Korea (hereinafter "registration of preservation of ownership") was completed.

The instant N-land included the instant subpons, (B) land caused by the occurrence of a disaster.

Ro-friendly.

(b) From 4th to 15th of the judgment of the first instance.

F. After that, on September 8, 1999, the registration of ownership preservation of the instant case was completed, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (U.S. District Court No. 7812, Feb. 27, 2003; hereinafter referred to as the “registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation”) under the name of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (U.S. District Court No. 7812, Feb. 27, 2003; hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Land and Housing Corporation”) due to a land substitution disposition under the Land and Housing Corporation Act, which combines the above O land with other land and the lot number of which was changed to the P.S. (attached Form 7).

In other words, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea (the above court No. 7814, Feb. 27, 2003; hereinafter referred to as the "registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea") has been completed due to the donation of a housing site development project implementer due to the completion of the housing site development project on the instant (the land listed in attached Table 7) and the above P land (the land listed in

Since then, Defendant Republic of Korea has occupied and used the land listed in the attached list No. 7 as a road site.

Ro-friendly.

(c)on No. 23 of the first instance judgment No. 4, the evidence No. 24 of the 20th judgment.

2. The judgment of the part concerning the claim for ownership confirmation among the instant lawsuit is ex officio, and the lawsuit for confirmation is at the time when the legal status of the parties is unstable.