logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.10.04 2018고단934
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. As to the Defendant A and the Defendant H’s joint crime of assaulting Defendant H in the past by the victim I, the Defendants would file a complaint against the victim for the crime of injuring the victim or inform the victim of the fact that the victim did not know of the high amount of agreement.

There was a mutual invitation to receive money by threatening victims.

Defendant

At around March 10, 2017, A calls from the victim, and “A has a photograph of assaulting Defendant H and the evidence on which his perception is recorded,” and if you do not know 30 million won as agreed money, it will report it to the police.

“Along with the purport that the Defendants were frightened to the victim, and the Defendants, on March 16, 2017, did not call the victim’s phone again at the fright site and did not call the victim “30 million won,” the Defendants would prepare a plan to deposit the victim into the J bank account of H by the date within the limit of 20 million won.

“The victim was crypted with the purport of “.”

As above, the Defendants attempted to threaten the victim and deliver KRW 20 million to the victim who was frightened, but the victim reported the Defendants to the police and attempted to commit such act.

2. At around March 8, 2017, Defendant A displayed D gambling sites to the victim H and “It is planned to engage in gambling by setting up various computer units in operating gambling offices and manipulating the winning rate, and there is no absolute loss of money, and when investing in the subject that received a loan, Defendant A will pay an amount equivalent to 1% of the amount invested per day.

“.” The purport was “.

However, the defendant did not operate a gambling office, and even if he received money from the injured party, he was merely intended to use it as his own gambling fund, and did not have the intent or ability to pay the investment money as promised to the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow