1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the court of first instance excluding any dismissal or addition as follows.

2. The amount of damages incurred to the Defendant at the fourth seven pages of the 4th part to the same 12th page is exceeding the amount of payment order as follows. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is without merit.

① A total of KRW 12,00,000 for the installation cost of a well damaged by a Plaintiff’s tort (5,00,000 for the installation cost of a septic tank 7,000,000 for the installation cost of a septic tank ) ② The Defendant was unable to operate a temple for the period of 23 months from August 30, 2009 to July 30, 201 as the supply of water was damaged by a well, etc. by the Plaintiff’s tort and the supply of water, thereby losing income of KRW 161,00,00 for the total of KRW 161,00 for each month as the Defendant was unable to operate the temple (5,00 for the installation cost of a septic tank 5,00 for the installation cost of a septic tank 23 months from August 30, 200 to July 30, 201).

[As to the general prohibition of the realization of the right by the method of self-help, it refers to Supreme Court Decision 2005Da17082 Decided February 22, 2007, etc. Meanwhile, evidence No. 9 (No. 38-8 of evidence No. 38)

(b) the entry.