logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.12 2015고단8049
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:58 on October 13, 2015, the Defendant driven a Dan-Jurbed car, and driven two lanes among the two lanes 136 lanes in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and proceeded at a speed that cannot be known from the area of the department store to the area of the control of the new car.

Since signal lights are installed on the front side of that place, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in accordance with traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side of the direction of the proceeding in violation of the signal, and received the victim D (82 tax) who crosses the crosswalk to the right side of the direction of the proceeding with the pedestrian signals, and received the front part of the said Aburged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to die by occupational negligence on October 13, 2015 at Hannam University (Seoul High School) Gannam University (Seoul High School), such as a low blood transfusion shock, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On the scene of a traffic accident, a motor vehicle boom photograph, photographic image, and body photograph;

1. Blue studs and video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (in contravention of the signals in front of a crosswalk, causing a traffic accident, and the negligence of the accused is also serious;

However, the defendant expressed his/her intention that the victim's bereaved family does not want punishment against the defendant under the consent of the victim's bereaved family; the fact that the victim was old at the time of the accident seems to have caused the serious result of death; the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance and thus the damage of the victim can be compensated by the victim; the defendant's primary crime is the age, sex, environment;

arrow