beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant is waiting for pedestrian signal in India while waiting for pedestrian signal on the signal, etc., and the victim was faced with the accident of this case in the front side of the left side, and the victim was faced with the front side of the driver’s vehicle for the walking aids of the defendant, so the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case even though the defendant was not negligent in the accident of this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the Defendant’s ex officio, the Prosecutor examined the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds for appeal by the Defendant, and the Defendant is a disabled person who is going on a guide for walking assistance.
On December 15, 2014, the Defendant was proceeding with D points in the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, about 10:35.
At the time, the Defendant, who was driving a pedestrian vehicle for pedestrian aids, had a duty of care to safely operate the pedestrian aids by keeping the front door and the right and the right well and controlling the direction and speed of the pedestrian aids in order to prevent collisions with pedestrians and other safety accidents.
However, the Defendant neglected to stop in front of the crosswalk and proceeded as it is, instead of negligent negligence, led the victim E (63 ) who was waiting to walk the crosswalk to cut off the crosswalk. The victim E (63 ) was placed in front of the chair for the above pedestrian aids and had the victim go beyond the victim.
Ultimately, Defendant 1 caused the injury to the victim, such as a scarke, a scarke, which requires about five weeks of treatment, due to such negligence.
Inasmuch as the subject of the adjudication against the defendant was changed by the court after filing an application for amendment to the indictment, the judgment of the court below was no longer maintained.
(b).