logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.29 2013가단205141
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. As a whole, the following facts may be acknowledged in light of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4 and 12.

The defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation on April 3, 1958 for Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "the commercial building of this case"), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 23, 2013 in the name of Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as "the commercial building of this case") on March 29, 2013.

On the other hand, F (GG students; hereinafter “the deceased”) had Plaintiff B, C, and D under the chain with Plaintiff A, the wife. On May 1, 2013, F (hereinafter “H, which was located in No. 506 of the instant shopping district, sent back to the hospital away from the stairs, and then died due to brain escape, brain cerebralop, cerebralopsis, cerebralopsis, thalopsis, etc. on May 2, 2013.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). 2. A

As a lawsuit of this case, the accident of this case was caused by the deceased's failure to meet the installation standards of stairs as stipulated in Article 15 of the Rules on the Criteria for Evacuation and Fire-Fighting Structure of the Building. The stairs of this case did not meet the standards for stairs, width and the upper end, height of stairs and the ceiling, height of railing, height of railing, and thickness. The accident of this case was caused by the defendant's violation of the duty to protect customers of commercial buildings, or due to defects in the installation and preservation of stairs of commercial buildings. The accident of this case was caused by the defects in the installation and preservation of stairs of commercial buildings, which are the amount equivalent to the plaintiffs' share of property (Plaintiff A15,00,000, c, D, 10,000, 300, 300, 300, 300, 305, 300, 305, 300, 305, 300, 305, 300.

B. Rule on the criteria for the escape and fire-prevention structure of a building, etc. was enacted by Ordinance of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation on May 7, 1999, and Article 2 of the Addenda thereto.

arrow