(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.03.15 2017고단208

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.03.15 2017고단208

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on January 27, 2017, at the victim D and the victim E’s residence located within the building C at the time of 17:00, the Defendant: (b) kept the victim out of diving with the victims; (c) placed the victim’s market price equivalent to KRW 1.80,000,000 at the victim D’s market price; (d) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 won at the market price; and (e) one mobile phone charging box at the mobile phone amounting to KRW 50,00,000,000 at the market price owned by the victim E; and (e) placed one head of the Tong at the Korean bank; and (e) Gyeongnam-do one head of the Tong.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property.

2. On February 6, 2017, from around 13:23, 2017 to 01:00 the following day, the Defendant ordered the victim F to pay the cost of computer use and food at the PC from the victim F’s PC located in G, as if he would normally pay the cost of computer use and food, and to use the computer at the place.

However, the defendant did not have the means of settlement such as cash and card, and thus did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was used and received food.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and being provided with a computer equivalent to KRW 18,300,000 from the victim; and (b) obtained a total of KRW 22,300,00 with food equivalent to KRW 4,00,00 in the market price.

3. On February 7, 2017, from around 20:56 to October 23:10 of the same month, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to use a computer at the place where the Defendant would normally pay the computer user fee and food cost, which was completed in the PC operated by the Victim H in macrosi from around 20:56 to October 23:10 of the same month.

However, the defendant did not have the means of settlement such as cash and card, and thus did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was used and received food.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2015.12.18 2015고단3058

-의정부지방법원 2018.01.29 2017고단5182

-서울남부지방법원 2013.03.21 2012고단4204

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.07.21 2015고단1518

-광주지방법원 2015.06.03 2015고단12