The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the victim C and his family members, who are the husband, were divorced due to the Defendant’s incompetence, and there was suspicion that the Defendant went through the examination to the effect that the Defendant is a imprudent that the Defendant neglected her children.

Therefore, from August 7, 2012, 2012. 23:14 to the victim's cell phone, "I am frith because I am frith because I n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n k n k k k n n k n n n k k n n n n k n k n n k n n n k k k n n k k n n k n n k n n n k n n n n n n n n n n n k n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n.)"

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, it is recognized that the "agreement" that contains the victim's intention not to be punished against the defendant on January 24, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case, was submitted to this court.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.