The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On December 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.: (a) went through a cting site to marry with the victim on or around January 2014; (b) the said victim continued to talk with other women; (c) while there was a conflict with E, the mother of the victim in the process of preparing for marriage, and (d) around April 4, 2014, the conflict with the victim was deepened, the victim’s cell phone using his/her mobile phone to “(F)” as “nickly, where the victim’s cell phone does not have any longer reported.” (d) The Defendant sent a text message, “Skick Skn Skin Skin Skick Sknick,” and sent it to the victim with fear or apprehensions repeatedly, such as the victim’s list, by no later than seven times until May 28, 2014.

B. On June 11, 2014, the Defendant of defamation calls several times at H in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the part of the victim’s workplace, on the ground that the victim D was not subject to the telephone, and “D’s sexual relationship is disturbed from the outside.”

We also get pregnant to get pregnant.

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as “,” etc.

(c)

Around January 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the grounds that: (b) the victim D and E were given birth of the Defendant on a three-day day after the victim was born by the victim D and the Defendant during the pregnancy in the child of the Defendant in the mountain father and the Rovia-dong, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, U.S. P., Seoyang-gu; (c) on the grounds that: (d) the Defendant’s child-friendly three persons, medical professionals, and the victims of the victim’s “Isson Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon,” and (e) the Defendant’s child support was not provided.

C. The victims are openly victims by openly speaking as C. H., H., E. P. L. L., E. L. L. L., and C. S. S. T. T. T. H.