A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for life due to a crime of death or injury resulting from fire to a structure existing in the Seoul Northern District Court on June 9, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2016, is serving in a number of principal prisons.

On July 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 16:55, at the front city medical room in the front city of 2034, the front city of 16:2034, the Defendant was fluoring the victim C in the same room; (b) while she was fluoring about 80 degrees of hot water in the same room; (c) she puts the victim’s head, chest, etc.; and (d) she took the victim’s face, side, etc. for about 6 weeks when she puts the victim into drinking and drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, C, E, and F;

1. Written self-statements from G, H, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to work reports, photographs, and medical certificates;

1. Grounds for sentencing of punishment pursuant to Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with labor for one month to seven years;

2. Where he commits a crime by carrying dangerous articles, the scope of the recommended punishment [the types of punishment] according to the sentencing criteria, [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall be limited to six months from June to three years from September, when he/she commits a serious injury (the determination in the sphere of recommendation].

3. That the Defendant recognized all the facts charged of this case and expressed his intention of reflection against the mistake, and that there was a dispute prior to the instant case with the victim who did not seem to have caused the instant crime due to influence, etc.

However, it does not seem that the Defendant committed the instant crime due to personal appraisal, and there is some room for consideration in the circumstances, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, this case is a serious injury that the defendant uses hot water to the victim, which is a video of two degrees.