The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around July 1, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the ground that the Defendant did not answer the victim D(23) in the victim D(3) who was a person who was a person who was in the same living room in the former correctional room located in 1934, a Donsan-ro, Donsan-ro, 2034, on the ground that he did not answer the victim at the end of this interrogation.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On May 28, 2018, after the institution of the instant prosecution, according to the Defendant’s defense counsel’s non-prosecution of punishment submitted to this court on May 28, 2018, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the victim expressed his/her intention not to have the Defendant punished.