(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.21 2016고단3746

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.21 2016고단3746

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is considered to be the defendant.

On March 3, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would collect the amount equivalent to two to three times the amount of money purchased by selling the forest land after three months, so that the Defendant would recover the amount equivalent to two to three times the amount of money purchased by selling the forest land after three months, if he/she purchased the forest land under the above J’s name.”

However, on May 24, 2003, in order to cancel various provisional seizures already established in the above forest, the defendant transferred the forest ownership to the J around May 24, 2003. The defendant filed a lawsuit against J on the cancellation of ownership transfer registration and won the above shares on September 20, 2007, and did not transfer the ownership due to various provisional seizures established as to the above shares. On June 26, 2009, the auction was already initiated by K, which is the creditor of the defendant. The above forest is within the development restriction zone and the anti-aircraft defense cooperation zone, and there was no investment value in the development restriction zone and the anti-aircraft defense cooperation zone, and there was no intention or ability of the defendant to sell the forest to the victim by clearing the transaction price equivalent to or more than 11 times the actual transaction price in the development restriction zone in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and there was no intention or ability to sell the above shares to the victim.

After all, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim, from the victim, to the N bank account in M under M’s name as the purchase price on March 29, 2010, through the remittance of KRW 175 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including H,O, and the part concerning the statement of the court);

1. Statement made to the prosecutor by the J;

1. H. H.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018노5303

-수원지방법원 2018.08.08 2017고단7769

-대전지방법원 2018.08.30 2017고단1397

-의정부지방법원 2016.02.01 2015고단3271

-수원지방법원 2016.05.12 2015노5813