1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff was unable to have the left side of the bridge at the cost of the enemy patriarche, and received the 4-5 T Hospital in Gunsan around November 1997 and on two occasions around April 1998.

B. On May 21, 2008, the Plaintiff applied to the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) due to the ebucks, ebucks, bucks, bucks, the right bridge, and sucks, which continued on May 21, 2008. On the same day, as a result, the Plaintiff conducted self-official filming (MRI) by the Defendant, and was in the middle of the 3-4 ebbbbrogic bucks under the diagnosis of the ebrogic ebrogate.

C. On September 15, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Defendant as vertebrate vertecom (MRI). As a result of the Plaintiff’s depication of climatic climatics (MRI), it was confirmed that the 3-4 vertec vertec vertec vertec vertec vertecs were aggravated.

Accordingly, on October 8, 2009, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital to undergo surgery, and on the following day.

9. The Defendant performed vertebrate expansion surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) under the U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. Had the Plaintiff’s nearby inspection.

E. After the instant surgery on October 10, 2009, the Plaintiff is a view that the result of self-marization (MRI) of self-marization after the surgery was at a more reduced level than before the surgery. Although the instant surgery was implemented on October 5, 2009, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on October 19, 2009.

F. As of July 6, 2011, the Plaintiff is in a state where wheel chairss can be moved under the name of “Dangsung damage and Matern Materna”, and is a state of movement.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff 1's assertion 3 years of death, resulting in the loss of the marina fee, and the left side of the bridge was somewhat inconvenient, but there was no obstacle to the movement without wearing auxiliary equipment or examining the stick.

However, there is a problem.