logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.10.08 2011가단30175
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A received surgery and treatment on the vertebrate vertebrate, etc. at the defendant hospital as follows, and the plaintiff B is the wife of the plaintiff A, the plaintiff C, and the plaintiff Eul are the children of the plaintiff A.

B. In 15 years, Plaintiff A was treated as scarcity scarcity or scarcity scarcity, and thereby, was found to have a sense below scarcitys, in particular, scarcitys and abnormal conditions. From around 2008, Plaintiff A was inspected by the E Hospital located in Daejeon, and was recommended to perform an operation on the part of the E Hospital No. 4-5 of the Mealy (hereinafter “MRI”), and was provided with surgery and treatment as follows at the Defendant Hospital and other medical institutions.

After November 11, 2008, 100 Hui No. 10, 2008, Mai No. 2000, Mai 2008, Mai Mai Man 2000, Mai Man Man 2000, Man Man 10000, Man 10000, Man 10000, Man 1000, 1000, 2000, 2000, 2000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,0000.

arrow