logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.03.28 2018구합3993
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 16, 2015 to December 8, 2017, the Plaintiff was working as the head of the culture and tourism department and team in B.

B. On March 24, 2015, the result of the inspection of the camping site in this case and the registration of tourism business (1) B) Group B Group shall check the operational status of the camping site from March 24, 2015 to April 27, 2015 upon receipt of the “request for the operational status and the cooperation for safety inspection of the camping site” to the effect that the camping site and the unregistered camping site under the Tourism Promotion Act should be inspected (hereinafter “inspection of this case”).

(2) At the time, the Plaintiff, the head of B-Gun’s staff C and the head of B-Gun’s team, who worked in B-Gun’s culture and tourism division, is the sum of 2,846 square meters in total, and 22,843 square meters in the site of the said tourist farm owned by the Korea Rural Community Corporation from October 13, 2014 by the F, who operates a tourist farm of “E” on the fourth parcel, such as Chungcheongbuk-do, an agricultural and forest area, etc., on April 24, 2015 during the instant inspection. In order to operate the said site as a camping site, the farmland conversion permission under Article 34(1)2 of the Farmland Act is necessary.

In the absence of permission to divert farmland and registration for camping business under the Tourism Promotion Act, a vehicle camping site (hereinafter referred to as “instant camping site”) was known.

3) On April 28, 2015, C indicated a comprehensive opinion on the camping site in this case, stating that “the camping site in this case was maintained and managed safely. However, the current state of registration is unregistered, and there is a task to partially solve farmland because it is a tourist farm” (hereinafter referred to as “instant checkup sheet”).

On the same day, the plaintiff and the head of culture, tourism and division G approved the above inspection table. 4) After that, on May 27, 2015, F made the instant camping site against the defendant.

arrow