beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay KRW 33,215,680 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount until October 7, 2015 and April 6, 2017.
Reasons
1. The following facts are without dispute between the parties, or facts following the facts are acknowledged: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Gap evidence No. 9, Gap evidence No. 10, Gap evidence No. 11-3, Gap evidence No. 15, Gap evidence No. 16, Gap evidence No. 20, Gap evidence No. 25, Gap No. 26, Gap evidence No. 45, Gap evidence No. 47, Gap No. 48, Eul evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 48, Eul evidence No. 4, Eul evidence No. 6-8, Eul evidence No. 23, Eul evidence No. 6-23, witness Eul's partial testimony, the result of the response order to submit financial transaction information to the Korean bank of this court, the testimony of Gap evidence No. 11-3, Eul evidence No. 16, Gap evidence No. 20, Gap evidence No. 4, and evidence No. 5 are insufficient.
The plaintiff and the defendant's related plaintiff are those engaged in the household manufacturing business, etc. with the trade name "F" in Gyeonggi-gun E, and the defendant is engaged in the household manufacturing and selling business.
B. G’s household manufacturing business G entered into a lease agreement with H on March 26, 2001 as the lease deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,400,000, and the lease term of KRW 36 months with respect to the above land, and on May 9, 2002, the above lease agreement was renewed several times while running a household manufacturing business by registering a household manufacturing factory on the above land.
C. (1) On September 9, 2014, the Plaintiff was engaged in the manufacturing industry, such as industrial machinery, transportation machinery, automation equipment, and general wood household. On March 5, 2014, when the Plaintiff, who was engaged in the above factory manufacturing industry, experienced financial difficulties, the Plaintiff lent part of the business funds and living expenses to G or repaid part of the unpaid wage obligations owed by G to the household factory employees. (2) On March 5, 2014, the Plaintiff provided a security deposit for the above household factory between G and G, and KRW 10 million,00,000, KRW 300,000,000, monthly rent, and KRW 300,000,000.