The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months and the additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment shows the attitude of the Defendant to recognize and reflect his mistake, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the employees K and that the health condition is not good due to the symptoms of the original state, etc. in the past.

However, in this case, in light of the contents and results of each crime, it is not easy to impose liability on the employees in light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant deceiving the victim F, defrauding the victim G by deceiving the victim F, deceiving the victim G in the name of solicitation of public officials, and giving and receiving KRW 4.2 million, and not paying the total of KRW 44 million to the workers.

In addition, it has not been agreed with the victim F and G until now, wage for workers has not been actually paid, and the defendant has been guilty of fraud.

Considering the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.