logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.13 2015고합423
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Defendant

A KRW 260 million shall be additionally collected from A.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s violation of the Act on Fraud and Attorney-at-Law was committed by the chief prosecutor, who is a senior executive officer of the prosecution without any awareness of any relationship with him/her, and the chief prosecutor, who is a senior executive officer of the prosecution, around ordinary world, is a large amount of punishment, and the chief of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency may have influence on the investigation agency because he/she is his/her own land-related relationship. The head of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, who is also a member of the National Tax Service, the Korea Petroleum Quality Service, and the Oil Pipeline Corporation, has been punished by false connection.

On March 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The head of the division of investigation by the Daejeon National Tax Service would settle the dispute with each other after a sentence,” and that “the head of the Daejeon National Tax Service requires five million won to conduct personnel affairs to the head of the division of investigation by the head of the Daejeon National Tax Service,” upon request of the victimO who was under investigation by the Daejeon District Tax Office for suspicion of tax evasion, etc., of tax evasion.”

However, the facts were between the first director of the Daejeon Regional Tax Office and the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to exercise any influence on the investigation by the National Tax Service on the suspicion of tax evasion against the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim in the name of solicitation expenses for public officials of the National Tax Service on the same day, and received money and valuables on the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by the public officials.

In addition, from that time until April 2014, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the cases or affairs handled by the public officials while receiving KRW 260,000,000 from the victims in total eight times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. The defendant A-.

arrow