Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on May 23, 2014, on the front side of Sinung City, parked in the way that the car of EF d (the age of 43) is connected to the Defendant’s residence; and (b) on the part of E, the Defendant was spited by the victim; and (c) on the part of E, he was spited by the victim, and was pushed down by the victim’s left shoulder by the Defendant’s right shoulder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of D, E, G, H, and I;

1. The police statement to J and K;

1. Each written statement of D and E (the defendant is limited to the extent that he or she takes spits against D and D, his or her conduct G, H, and I, and that he or she has spits D with D by shouldering it as stated in the facts charged. However, the defendant consistently states that D, E, G, H, and I spits D with D by shouldering it (this fact that D has committed assault against the defendant) and the defendant and D have consistently complied with each other in relation to the circumstances in which the defendant and D were unspited due to parking problems. The defendant's statements on the process of vision are not rejected because they comply with the police statement of J, a part of the defendant's employees.

(2) In the police police, J also stated that “Defendant D was satisfed several times, and E was satisfed by Defendant D, and only her fly fly, and G was satched” (The J stated in the court that “the Defendant was satched by D and did not constitute the fact of assaulting D,” but in light of the relationship between the police statement and the Defendant as seen earlier, it is difficult to believe the legal statement of J as it is.

(3) A victim(s), H(s) and I (unclaimed colony operation) did not have a good health condition, and G, even based on J’s police statement, only fighting was conducted, and at the time of the instant case, unilaterally from D at the time.