logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.01.22 2015고단3967
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) (hereinafter “C”), around 21:10 on August 2, 2015, extracted trees planted in the above test room from the “C” c, located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with no justifiable reason under the influence of alcohol from the c, and entered the victim’s d (e.g., 59 years of age) with a hand-on floor one time in which the victim D (n., e., 28 years of age) was tight, with the victim D and E (n., 28 years of age). On the other hand, when the victim’s face was tight, the victim’s E body (39 years of age), the victim F (39 years of age), and G (32 years of age), etc. were divided into the victim’s marier’s son’s floor at one time, and the victim’s humna’s son’s son at one time.

The mother of the defendant showed that he flicked the victim E head debt, flicked the victim F's head debt, flicked the victim F, flicked the victim's head debt, and flicked the victim D head debt and flicked the flicked.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim D, F, E, and G in conjunction with H.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant’s failure to stop fighting and to stop the Defendant from entering the said sprink; and (b) the Defendant’s failure to walk the bucks on the part of the said J; and (c) the Defendant bucks on the part of the Defendant, who walked with the bucks on the part of the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant bucks on the part of the Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, F, J, D, and E;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; Act No. 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 2(2)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow