logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.08.28 2014누4765
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 비대상 결정처분 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 26, 1980, the plaintiff was discharged from active service on November 30, 1982, when he was discharged from active service on the second brigade of the Marine Corps after completing training on behalf of the Marine Corps.

B. On March 25, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) was in the military service with respect to the Defendant, thereby damaging the snivers of snife snife snife snife snife snife (hereinafter “instant wounds”); (b)

On July 29, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the eligibility of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Defendant did not confirm objective supporting materials, such as the place of beds where it can verify the identity of official duties, such as performance of duties or education and training, against the Plaintiff, on the ground that the injury in the instant case was not recognized as an injury incurred during his duty or education and training.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was under military service at around September 1980, when he was under military service, received treatment by taking a scambied hand from a scambrue, but even thereafter, the harm of this case occurred in which scams and fingers are not properly bended. Thus, the plaintiff is a soldier or policeman on duty or a soldier or policeman of distinguished service to the State (person eligible for veteran's compensation).

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant statutes;

C. 1) The plaintiff, on September 1980, who was on duty at the 2nd reinforcement unit B of the Marine Disease, performed the first work with the direction of the mid-term commander, and moved the swimming to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the shot to the s

arrow