1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 31, 197, the Plaintiff entered the Army Soldiers with B students on March 31, 1977, and was discharged from military service on December 27, 1979.

나. 원고는 2013. 4. 4. 피고에게 “1977. 4. 7. 목봉체조기합을 받던 중 내무반장이 왼발 뒤꿈치를 가격하여 뼈가 깨지고 신경이 끊어지는 부상을 당함. 1977. 7. 20. 내무반 침상 위에 엎드려 기합을 받던 중 고참이 야전삽으로 허리를 가격하여 부상을 당함. 1977. 10.경 내무반에서 병장 C이 아무런 이유 없이 뺨을 여러 번 때리고 주먹으로 가슴을 10차례 가격하여 가슴에 피멍이 들고 가슴뼈에 요철이 생기는 부상을 당함.”을 이유로 ‘왼발 뒤꿈치, 허리, 가슴 상이’(이하 ‘신청상이’라 한다)에 대한 국가유공자 등록신청을 하였다.

C. On August 19, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-competent determination of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “It is difficult to recognize the existence of the difference in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the protection, security, etc. of the State, security, etc. of the State, and it is difficult to recognize that there was proximate causal relation with the injury incurred in the performance of duties or education and training not directly related to national defense, security, etc., and that there was a proximate causal relation with official duties.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 4 through 6, 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that there was no error in the physical examination before entering the Plaintiff, and that there was a group unity, ice, ice, and ice in the military unit.

Therefore, the instant disposition is unlawful.

B. In order to constitute a person who rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, there should be a proximate causal relationship between the performance of his/her duties or education and training.