logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.09.07 2010가합44298
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party status 1) Defendant C is the doctor in charge of the Plaintiff’s treatment at the F Hospital located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Defendant D is the doctor working at the F Hospital, and Defendant B is the H Hospital located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, G (hereinafter “H Hospital”).

(2) The Plaintiff is a medical corporation operating the medical corporation. (2) The Plaintiff is a patient who undergoes surgery, such as free removal of body and stimulation, at the F Hospital on September 1, 2008; (3) around June 9, 2009, using the right plate from H Hospital; and (4) the part of the upper floor from the right-hand sprinks on July 3, 2009, using the right-hand sprink; and (4) around September 8, 2009, received a cutting surgery not to the right-hand right-hand due to duplicing around September 8, 2009.

B. On August 208, 2008, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the above hospital on September 1, 2008, and was diagnosed as satisfying assistive devices, Hanjing treatment, satisfying treatment, and so on. (2) On August 28, 2008, the Plaintiff was given a prescription for metregying, satfying and human satching treatment from the medical professionals in the F hospital, and was hospitalized at the above hospital on September 1, 2008, and received a diagnosis of metregying, satfying, satisfying, satisfying, and satisfying, satching, and satisfying. (3) On September 28, 2008, the Plaintiff was hospitalized from Defendant C to the above hospital.

3) On September 19, 2008, when receiving a outpatient treatment from a F Hospital, the Plaintiff was in charge of the surgery, blicking and pressureed, and was provided with antibiotics, etc., as well as receiving physical treatment, radar treatment, and drug treatment from September 23, 2008. (4) On November 5, 2008, the Plaintiff was in charge of the surgery performed at the F Hospital, and was in charge of the surgery’s chest removal and flishing. (2) Thereafter, the Plaintiff was in charge of the surgery’s flish removal and flishing treatment and the flishing treatment by November 28, 2008.

(c) at the I Hospital;

arrow