logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단5953
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 6, 2016, at around 06:17, Defendant A, at D clubs located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Incheon, Defendant A, after receiving 112 report that “the Defendant carried a frightion, such as leaving an article without paying the drinking value,” expressed a desire to arrest the offender in the act of fraud from F at the border of the Incheonnam Police Station E-gu, Incheon,nam Police Station, to “I am back the CCTV and I am back the CCTV,” and assaulted the chest part of the above F at one time as the left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 2016. 8. 6. 05:48경 위 D 클럽에서 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천남동경찰서 경장 피해자 F이 술값을 지급하지 않는 이유에 대하여 묻자 그곳 업주 및 종업원이 있는 가운데 피해자에게 ‘지랄하네 씨발새끼들 병신들’이라고 욕설하고 계속하여 위 클럽 밖으로 나간 후 업주 등이 지켜보는 앞에서 피해자에게 ‘야이 씨발새끼야 개새끼야’라고 말하고, 같은 날 06:25경 인천 남동구 G에 있는 E지구대에서 클럽 업주 및 다른 사건관련자들이 있는 앞에서 피해자에게 ‘짭새새끼들 씨발’이라고 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Application of field photographs and investigation reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fine

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be given in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) is that Defendant A had the record of having been punished as an insulting crime by obscing a police officer, but he again committed the instant crime.

arrow