logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.23 2014고단1209
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C low-est car.

The Defendant, on December 14, 2013, was in the state of suspension of driving license around 21:00, but was under the influence of blood alcohol concentration of 0.067%, and entered the same road in front of the household store of "Nown" at the "Nown" parking lot located in the new-dong of Gwangju Mine-gu.

At the time, since it is night and a wide range of vehicle traffic, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to enter the road by checking the front side and the left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by negligence of driving a vehicle in the front of the week prior to the sobrith of alcohol, was driven by the victim D (hereinafter, 1982 students) who was straighted along two-lanes on the right-hand side of the vehicle driving by the victim D (hereinafter, 1982 students) with two-lanes on the right-hand side of the vehicle driving by the defendant, and due to the shock, caused the victim D's vehicle to be driven by the victim F (1982 students) who was driving by the victim F.(1982 students) who infringed on the central line and carried on the opposite lane, and caused the victim D's vehicle to be driven by the victim H(1982 students).

After all, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the multiple typology strings, etc. requiring a multi-time treatment for approximately two weeks from the victim D who was on board the said Lone Star car, and suffered from the victim H, who was on board the said S5 car, about two weeks of treatment, about about two weeks of treatment, in each of the following cases: (a) the victim H, who was on board the said S5 car, was in need of a multi-time treatment for about two weeks of treatment; (b) the victim H, who was on board the said S5 car, was in need of a multi-time treatment for about two weeks of treatment; and (c) the victim H, who was on board the said S5 car, was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow